How to organise / structure and find
/ share
what we know about us, the world, and the in-between!
|
|
My challenge
is to connect and transcend sectors, categories, sign-systems, and scale and
be helpful, do something that matters towards mount survival and awareness.
See also expanding comapssion and reducing the infliction of suffering. In roundtables
I sometimes ask for concerns and offers people want to share, but I also
“played” what is “your favourite animal or
“plant” in a circle. Very effective to fast and deeply learn
about others and “other, new” concern was to have people
introduce themselves by concretely presenting what they have done and
actually and concretely do & plan in
these fields, and where they see sectors connecting. Here my examples as a
teaser, but I must confess it is hard to shop real life actions into one sector and feel many aspects and
perspectives are not fitting.
|
|||||
|
You can also
use more sectors: |
Try to think about your real contributions and work also in the fields below: (I will add mine later) |
|||||
|
Source: |
Peace & Security:
|
Education: Education Self and Social
Transformation as an Alternative to
Compulsory Education Science & Technology: |
Business & Economics: Media: |
|
||
Please see how thes “flat” pie diagrams went with BMH into Peace Room
and SYNCONS, and towards Conscious
Evolution, and an “New Agora”. Please see: http://21stcenturyagora.org/
|
|
Center for
Conscious Evolution and EVOLVE
For Syncons and Dialog methods see Barbara Marx-Hubbard and Jerome Glenn, Millennium Project best start here: |
The optimal learning culture in relation
to learning. The model is based on Jung’s concepts (Source: Rolf
Jackson oberion.com |
There are not only the circles, there is town-square in some cultures to bring together subjects and positions and have them overlap and mingle. Show for example in quadrants like ALL QUADRANTS how we can go beyond linear list to relations and other dimensions (scales) –This is what every management and strategy consultant like – a grid to explain options. See Ken Wilber being covered in the Wholeness Seminar in 1996 or so.
These circles, and wheels are meaningful and helpful and are used in many cultures, and are even projected in depth, see 3-dimenional mandalas – goto: http://9-d.org we need to add here soon the ENNEAGRAMM and TENSEGRITY structures – but they are well covered in the work of Anthony Judge and Buckminster Fuller – so enjoy another slant on representations and displays here:
|
Intelligent Enneagram (Anthony Blake) and the Supreme Art of Dialogue |
Tensegrity – Syntegrity Structures: Anthony Judge and Buckminster Fuller |
Und multi-modal bridging between “orders”: Fig 2 (thanks Antony Judge) and Fig. 6 Computation for Metaphors, Analogy, Imitation & Embodiment, and Agents:
|
To address the subtle differences between meanings and values more has to be done than just contextualise and find common frames of references to negotiate unity in diversity. I propose to check out this recent research and project proposal and see these “stumbling blocks” to be addressed in inter-cultural, multi-lingual mediation and dialog and deliberation contexts:
Transcultural Dialog and Peace-Making: Stumbling blocks preventing true dialog, peace-making, and reconciliation:
1) we fight over words but do not check the meaning,
2) we do not question and compare the values attached to statements and attitudes,
3) we do not contextualize and embody concepts and meaning, do not check the sectors, regions, scales, proportions and consequences of alternative actions,
4) we do not give voice, empower, listen, cherish and cultivate difference or variety in dialog and decision making,
5) Disorientation and dumbing-down in Cyberculture and a misadministered and misunderstood, intangible “Globalisation”: Where we get overloaded by communication noise (sign/symbol melange) and media demagogy which means: no trust and fidelity in the statements and no ways and means to check the credibility and impact/relevance, and get lost between the scales, brackets, and sectors.
6) The above incompatibility and incomparability opens the door for over-claims and oversimplifications. Leaders use intangible jargon (plastic-words), neglect impacts and avoid instead of exploring differences and alternatives.
INTERN NOTES: to be done: Add: Anthony Judge and Categories into lattices & by polarity & other”wise” Add: 9-d.org and Aizu: see also Trans and Session Dialog&Learning Add: Supersigns & superstructures & Order and Generalizations Add: Covenant Add: Competences and Capacities and Orientation and Order Slides