OPEN
FORUM Background Paper Collection -- Paper 1
Necessary, indispensable
requisite requirments to cultivate and maintain
DIALOG, DELIBERATION, AND
DECISION CULTURES
The Laws in simple english
words are nicely put in simplified way here: 
PLEASE NOTE – WE ARE PRESENTLY TRANSLATING –
please come back soon !
Please note, the original table in German
can be found here:
|
REQUISITE Requirements: Systemic „Law“ Sources / Originated by: |
Description |
Examples when the law/ requirmetns is violated |
Examples when adhering to the
“law”. |
|
RequisiteVariety Ashby |
Appreciation of the wealth and variety of
perspectives and positions |
Failure of the Round-Table in East Germany after the first couple of sessions when lobbyists and associations moved in and stakeholders and risktakers had to step down. (Uhlmann) |
|
|
Requisite
Parisomony Minimality/
Sparsamkeit Miller, Warfield |
Appreciation of condensed and terse represention in order to
establish workability and overseeability of ruling and guiding decisive
facts. |
|
|
|
Requisite
Saliency Boulding |
Relative Saliency and Importance can be only
when comparing and negotiating in concrete sets and frames. See also the
extensionality reuirements below. |
|
|
|
Requisite
Meaning Peirce Qualitative: Wisdom - Value |
Relative Meaning and Wisdom can be established in a dialogue by the participants only after the relations, similarities, priorities, influences, and overlaps have been established in the given set. |
|
|
|
Requisite
Autonomy of Distinction Making Tsivacou (in the evaluation of
differences) |
Mandatory is a safeguarding of the autonomy and authenticity of every participant during the deliberation. |
|
|
|
Requisite
Evolution of Observation Dye Evolution not fixation ! |
A requisite for learning is the shared search for commons and interdependencies, so concepts and realisations can „grow“. |
|
|
|
Requisite
Action Laoris, Christakis and Pragmatic Action !? |
Words without action are futile, percepts, without concepts a blind, concepts without percepts emptry. (free after
I. Kant) |
|
|
|
|
THE WORK BELOW IS VERY MUCH IN
PROGRESS… |
|
|
|
FRAMING |
(general
and relative orientation): * |
“Outline-Conditions”
work in progress below: |
|
|
Requisite
Inclusion of systems and forms of expression,
presentation, and representations Warburg,
Stachowiak, Peirce, Benking multi-lingual/cultural – extended cultual expressions and sign-systems
** |
As above !! Additionality
to the above other forms of expressions and reprentations and their
combination ! including
polycontextuality need to be included beyond the prevailing dualistic
mindsets. See Spinoza, Leibniz,… |
|
|
|
Requisite
Inclusion of CONTEXT, ORIENTATION,
and SITUATION Inclusion
of temporal and spacial scales and
“intangible dimensions” Exentionality,
Positionality and Perspectivity Jonas,
Plessner, Bateson, Benking See also: Zusammenhang und Zusammenhalt and Local
Community Decision making with a Cognitive Panorama And data traps and frames, group and clan-think – see Warfield. |
As above !! Der
Unterschied liegt in der poly-contextualität jenseits von Dualismen und deren
konkreten Darstellung. See
Spinoza, Leibniz,… to be expanded by thinkers like Jean Gebser and Herbert Stachowiak See
also: Higher Education and Grand Challenges below. |
|
|
* Framing or “common/general
versus specific Frames of references” is a
central concern in decision making and modern “attention economy” communication
strategies. The focus is not to overwhelm the audience and secure a clear slot
for focussed information and concern. See also hypercognition, the work of
Lakoff, where the definiton depends on the outline drawn. I recommend to look
onto the Conceptual
Superstructure work started in the early 90ies and work done in the field
of environmetnal research and management (meta-data versus
meta-information) and terminology research, reposities and switching
systems. See also Supersigns and Superstructures below.
** regarding
Sign Systems and Cultural Systems, Supersigns and Superstructures see: http://benking.de/systems/codata/CODATA-MIST2005-ppt-s_files/frame.htm
SLIDE 20 and 27 and this about ethics with space and time horizon http://benking.de/jonas-1993.html and http://benking.de/mitgefuehl-leiden.html sorry only in German so far but this might be a good
starter: SHOW or SCHAU ? http://benking.de/show-schau.htm.
Please see also the proposal: humanities
and virtual worlds (PDF) – for New
Peace Dialogues (ALF) – Volumes on Future of Higher Education – Grand
Challenges – and last not least and again again the work of Alexander
Christakis, Warfield, Ozbekhan, and Jantsch.
PLEASE NOTE – WE ARE PRESENTLY TRANSLATING the last 3 columns – please
come back soon ! 
OPEN FORUM Background Paper Collection -- Paper 1